The Internal Operations Committee periodically conducts interviews of candidates for seats on the IPM Advisory Committee. On December 1, 2014, the Internal Operations Committee directed the IPM Coordinator to develop a plan to convert the current IPM Advisory Committee Public Member two-year term appointments to four-year term appointments with staggered term expiration dates.
In order to achieve this goal, IPM staff proposed the plan depicted below to achieve the conversion of seat terms and also to stagger the terms.
Seat Name |
Current Term Expiration Date |
Transition Term |
Subsequent Four-Year Terms |
At Large 1 |
12/31/15 |
1/1/16-12/31/19 |
1/1/20-12/31/23 |
At Large 2 |
12/31/15 |
1/1/16-12/31/19 |
1/1/20-12/31/23 |
At Large 3 |
12/31/15 |
1/1/16-12/31/18 |
1/1/19-12/31/22 |
At Large Alternate |
12/31/15 |
1/1/16-12/31/18 |
1/1/19-12/31/22 |
Environmental Organization |
12/31/16 |
1/1/16*-12/31/18 |
1/1/19-12/31/22 |
PEHAB (Public and Environmental Health Advisory Board) |
12/31/15 |
1/1/16-12/31/19 |
1/1/20-12/31/23 |
Fish & Wildlife Committee |
12/31/15 |
1/1/16-12/31/19 |
1/1/20-12/31/23 |
*The Environmental Organization seat was recently vacated due to resignation of the incumbent, permitting the next seat term to be adjusted to commence on 1/1/16 without impacting a seated member.
Since the IPM Committee does not currently differentiate the At-Large seats by numbers, the IOC recommends that numbers be assigned when individuals are appointed to those seats later this year.
Changes to the seat terms and expirations will necessitate the following changes to the IPM Advisory Committee bylaws:
III. Terms/Elections
A. Committee:
1. The terms for the Department Representatives do not expire. All other members shall serve for a term of two (2) four (4) calendar years. Any vacancies during the term of the member shall be filled for the remainder of that two (2) four (4) calendar year term. Members may serve more than one (1) two-year four-year term if reappointed.
The proposed modified bylaws are attached hereto for reference and also reflect other minor changes to update outdated references.
Should the Board elect to not approve the recommendations, that status quo would be maintained.