PDF Return
C. 39
To: Board of Supervisors
From: TRANSPORTATION, WATER & INFRASTRUCTURE COMMITTEE
Date: June  18, 2019
The Seal of Contra Costa County, CA
Contra
Costa
County
Subject: ADOPT advocacy positions on the following state bills: AB 1568 (McCarty), SB 137 (Dodd), SB 228 (Jackson), SB 336 (Dodd)

APPROVE OTHER
RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE

Action of Board On:   06/18/2019
APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
Clerks Notes:

VOTE OF SUPERVISORS

AYE:
John Gioia, District I Supervisor
Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor
Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor
Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor
Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor
Contact: John Cunningham (925) 674-7833
cc: Lara Delaney    
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED:     June  18, 2019
David Twa,
 
BY: , Deputy

 

RECOMMENDATION(S):

ADOPT advocacy positions on the following state bills: OPPOSE AB 1568 (McCarty), SUPPORT SB 137 (Dodd), SUPPORT SB 228 (Jackson), and OPPOSE SB 336 (Dodd). Note that AB 1568 (McCarty) was held in Appropriations and will not advance this year; an advocacy letter will not be sent at this time.

FISCAL IMPACT:

There is no direct fiscal impact from the adoption of advocacy positions. The fiscal impact of each bill, if known, is included in the background information for each bill.

BACKGROUND:

At its April 8, 2019 and June 10, 2019 meetings, the Transportation, Water, and Infrastructure Committee (Chair Mitchoff, Vice Chair Andersen) considered the following bills and directed staff, by unanimous vote, to send them to the Board of Supervisors for adoption of an advocacy position, AB 1568 (McCarty), SB 137 (Dodd), SB 228 (Jackson), and SB 336 (Dodd).  

BACKGROUND: (CONT'D)
  
AB 1568 (McCarty) was held in Appropriations and will not advance this year; an advocacy letter will not be sent at this time.  
  
Details  
  
AB 1568 (McCarty): Housing law compliance: prohibition on applying for state grants.  
Description: Prohibits cities and counties from applying for state grants, except for specified transportation funding, if the city or county has been found to violate state housing law.  
Position Recommendation: OPPOSE - Rationale: AB 1568 does not include a clear definition of what constitutes a "state grant". That said, the bill puts a significant amount of funding available to the County at risk.  
Status: Re-referred to the Committee on Appropriations  
Other: California State Association of Counties (CSAC) letter of opposition: http://blob.capitoltrack.com/19blobs/904c4ddb-0294-4bab-ad6d-2d42790d346f  
Bill Text: http://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=201920200SB137  
  
SB 137 (Dodd): Federal transportation funds: state exchange programs  
Description: The bill would allow the state, regions, cities and counties to reduce the cost of transportation projects and provide for more projects to be completed with the same amount of revenue by expanding the existing Match Exchange Program to include eligibility for larger regions and for local safety and bridge projects.  
Position Recommendation: SUPPORT - Rationale: CSAC estimates that the federal aid process adds anywhere from fifteen to forty percent to the cost of a project; especially for smaller projects. This bill does not require, but authorizes, the state to expand the successful Match Exchange Program to the extent that state funds are available and that the additional exchanges would not compromise other state funded projects or activities.  
Status: Assembly Transportation Committee  
Other: CSAC is the sponsor.  
Bill Text: http://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=201920200SB137  
  
SB 228 (Jackson): Master Plan on Aging  
Description: This bill requires the Governor to appoint a Master Plan (on Aging) Director and establishes an Aging Task Force. The bill would require a series of other actions and directives impacting numerous state departments and stakeholders resulting in the identification of policies and priorities that need to be implemented in California to prepare for the aging of its population  
Position Recommendation: SUPPORT - Rationale: SB 228 is consistent with the County's existing platform including 2016-17 revisions made in response to the Aging Imperative planning process which the County participated in.   
Status: Assembly Aging and Long Term Care Committee  
Other: CSAC Support Letter: http://blob.capitoltrack.com/19blobs/f51ae919-0f19-4a8d-9622-3bcee38983a8
Bill Text: http://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=201920200SB228  
  
  
SB 336 Dodd: Transportation: fully-automated transit vehicles  
Description: This bill requires transit operators to staff their autonomous transit vehicles with at least one trained employee.  
Position Recommendation: OPPOSE - Rationale: From the Senate Transportation Analysis, "By requiring an employee in virtually every AV used for public transit purposes, this bill diminishes the benefit of using AVs, making them less useful as a tool to help transit agencies provide their riders with better service."  
Status: Assembly Transportation Committee  
Bill Text: http://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=201920200SB336

CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION:

If action is not taken the Board will forgo an opportunity to communicate policy positions to the State Legislature.

AgendaQuick©2005 - 2024 Destiny Software Inc., All Rights Reserved