PDF Return
C. 24
To: Board of Supervisors
From: David Twa, County Administrator
Date: May  12, 2015
The Seal of Contra Costa County, CA
Contra
Costa
County
Subject: Unrepresented Management Lump Sum Payment

APPROVE OTHER
RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE

Action of Board On:   05/12/2015
APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
Clerks Notes:

VOTE OF SUPERVISORS

AYE:
John Gioia, District I Supervisor
Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor
Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor
Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor
ABSENT:
Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor
Contact: Craig Taylor, Benefits Supervisor (925) 335-1746
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED:     May  12, 2015
David Twa,
 
BY: , Deputy

 

RECOMMENDATION(S):

PROVIDE a one-time lump sum payment in the amount of $500 to Dawn Dougherty (unrepresented).  

FISCAL IMPACT:

100% County General Fund. The cost of the lump sum payment is $500 (one-time).















BACKGROUND:

Dawn Dougherty (employee # 71593) worked for many years as a Payroll Technician represented by AFSCME Local 2700. Dawn accepted a promotion to HR Technician, effective April 13, 2015, which is unrepresented. Under Resolution No. 2014/109 approved by the Board on April 22, 2014, Appointed Department Heads, Management, Exempt and Unrepresented employees receive a $500 lump sum payment on April 1, 2015. Under Resolution No. 2014/257 that was approved by the Board July 29, 2014, employees in Local 2700 receive a lump sum of $750 on June 10, 2015. As a full-time employee of Local 2700, Ms. Dougherty would have been entitled to receive a lump-sum payment if she had not been promoted. However, due to her window of promotion she missed both of the lump sum payments made to members of Local 2700 and unrepresented management. Although under the terms of the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with Local 2700 and the agreement with unrepresented managers, the employee must be employed by the County in a classification represented by the Union or unrepresented as of certain dates. Ms. Dougherty was not represented by either group as of those specific dates. However, as noted above, the timing of her promotion is the reason why she is ineligible for the lump sum. Therefore, the County Administrator is recommending that an exception be made in order for Ms. Dougherty to receive the lump sum payment of $500 as an unrepresented employee.

CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION:

This longtime County employee would not receive the lump sum payment her co-workers received due to her promotion from Local 2700 to unrepresented management.  

CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT:

Not applicable.

AgendaQuick©2005 - 2024 Destiny Software Inc., All Rights Reserved