PDF Return
D.3
To: Board of Supervisors
From: Brian M. Balbas, Public Works Director/Chief Engineer
Date: March  2, 2021
The Seal of Contra Costa County, CA
Contra
Costa
County
Subject: Resolution of Necessity Hearing for the Danville Boulevard/Orchard Court Complete Street Improvements project, Alamo area.

APPROVE OTHER
RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE

Action of Board On:   03/02/2021
APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
Clerks Notes:

VOTE OF SUPERVISORS

AYE:
John Gioia, District I Supervisor
Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor
Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor
Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor
Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor
Contact: Jann Edmunds, 925. 957-2454
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED:     March  2, 2021
Monica Nino, County Administrator
 
BY: , Deputy

 

RECOMMENDATION(S):

OPEN the public hearing and ask if any notified property owners wish to be heard as to the four items specified in Section B below, CLOSE the Public Hearing.  
  

Upon completion and closing of the hearing, MAKE the findings and determinations listed under Section B below, and ADOPT the attached Resolution of Necessity No. 2021/67 to acquire the required property by eminent domain. Project No.: 0662-6R4128

BACKGROUND:

A. Proposed Project  



FISCAL IMPACT:

In eminent domain actions, the judgment will be the price paid for the property, and may include interest and court costs that are regarded as a roughly calculable expense of property acquisition. Costs of acquisition will be paid with monies from various funding sources (66% Highway Safety Improvement Program Cycle 8 Federal Funds, 33% Measure J Regional Funds, and 1% Local Road Funds). (DCD-CP No. 17-33)  
  

BACKGROUND: (CONT'D)
  
The Danville Boulevard/Orchard Court Complete Streets Improvements Project (the “Project”) includes construction of a roundabout and sidewalk improvements at the Danville Boulevard/Orchard Court intersection, in the Alamo area of unincorporated Contra Costa County. The purpose of the Project is to improve traffic, bicycle, and pedestrian safety on Danville Boulevard, between Jackson Way and Stone Valley Road, in the Alamo area, by installing complete streets improvements. The Project includes curb extensions, curb ramps, and entry medians at the roundabout to reduce vehicle speeds and improve pedestrian crossings. Sidewalks will be reconstructed in the Project area, along with curb extensions and curb ramps, in order to meet Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements and to accommodate existing mature trees in the sidewalk.  
  
The Project will reduce lanes of vehicle travel, from two lanes to one lane, at the roundabout approaches, which will result in decreased vehicle speeds as vehicles enter the roundabout. This and other aspects of the Project will improve vehicle, bicycle, and pedestrian safety.   
  
On September 18, 2018, the Board of Supervisors approved the Project and determined the Project was exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), under the Class 1(c) Categorical Exemption, pursuant to Article 19, Section 15301 of the CEQA Guidelines. The CEQA notice of exemption was filed on September 19, 2018.   
  
In order to proceed with the Project, it is necessary for the County to exercise its power of eminent domain. Pursuant to Section 1245.235 of the Code of Civil Procedure, notice was given to all persons listed on the attached Exhibit “A” whose names and addresses appear on the last equalized County Assessment Roll. This notice consisted of sending, by first-class and certified mail on January 27, 2021, a Notice of Intention to Adopt a Resolution of Necessity, which notified the owners that a hearing is scheduled for March 2, 2021, at 9:30 a.m., in the Board's Chambers at 1025 Escobar Street, Martinez, California. Those notices indicated that, at the above time and place, the owners may appear to be heard on the matters referred to in the notice.  
  
B. Scope of Hearing and Findings Per C.C.P. Section 1245.245  
  
1. Public interest and necessity require the Project.   
  
With average daily traffic of approximately 20,000 vehicles per day, and with one of the highest rates of pedestrians and bicyclists within the County, this principal arterial - Danville Boulevard - is ranked in the County’s top 20 corridors with the highest number of collisions in the past five years. When the Project was being planned, it was determined that the collision rate at the intersection was approximately 2.5 times higher than the statewide average; and, at this intersection, there had been at least three pedestrian and 13 bicycle collisions in the 10 years prior to the planning phase of the Project.   
  
The Project will include the installation of a roundabout at the intersection of Danville Boulevard and Orchard Court, which will improve safety at this location. The Project also will shorten pedestrian crossings across roadways, and it will reduce congestion at this intersection by keeping vehicles moving through the intersection. The Project will repair or replace sidewalks within the Project area, some of which have lifted and are impairing access to persons with disabilities. The Project also is a complete streets project that will result in enhanced aesthetics and the greening of Danville Boulevard. The Project aims to improve safety through the corridor for all users by improving sidewalks to meet ADA requirements and reducing conflicts at the Danville Boulevard/Orchard Court intersection. This is intended to help encourage residents, businesses, and customers of those businesses to use active modes of transportation.  
  
2. The project is planned and located in the manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and the least private injury.  
  
The Project, as planned and located, will achieve the Project purposes, and will require a partial acquisition of adjacent properties – the acquisition of both permanent and temporary rights as described in Appendix A. The areas to be acquired also are shown on aerial right of way image attached hereto as Exhibit “B.” The Project, as planned and located, avoids the partial or full acquisition of any buildings, and it will not displace any businesses before, during, or after Project construction. The Project design and alignment ensure that the Project purposes will be achieved, including improving vehicle, bicycle, and pedestrian safety, improving ADA access, and enhancing or greening the Project area. During Project construction, best management practices will be implemented to avoid unnecessary impacts to residents, businesses, and the traveling public. At least one lane of travel in each direction will be open to vehicle travel during Project construction. Emergency vehicles will have access through the Project area at all times.   
  
Alternatives to the Project were evaluated and rejected, either because the alternatives would not meet the Project purposes, or, if they did meet the Project purposes, because the alternatives would result in significantly greater impacts to property owners and occupants and the traveling public. The first alternative that was evaluated involved shifting the Project footprint southwest. However, that alignment would have required the realignment of Orchard Court, and the partial or full acquisition of a building that is occupied by existing businesses and an at-grade parking area below the building (a portion of the building is constructed over the parking area). Another alternative that was evaluated involved shifting the Project footprint further southwest to avoid these impacts, but that alignment would not have achieved the objectives of the Project. Under that alignment, Orchard Court would not have fed into the roundabout, and that alignment would have created conflicts between vehicles using the roundabout and vehicles bypassing the roundabout. That alignment would have created safety hazards because of those conflicts. Therefore, these alignments were considered and rejected because they were not planned and located in the manner that would be most compatible with the greatest public good and the least private injury.  
  
Last year, County Public Works Department staff met with DS Properties 17’s representatives to determine an alignment that would still meet the Project overall goals and purposes, and also limit the impact to the DS Properties 17’s property, which is improved with the Alamo Plaza Shopping Center. In a meeting in August of 2020, County staff and DS Properties 17’s representatives and engineers met to discuss the Project alignment, and an amicable resolution was reached, resulting in the current Project design. Therefore, the Project is planned and located to be most compatible with the greatest public good and the least private injury.  
  
3. The properties sought to be acquired are necessary for the Project.  
  
The property interests described in Appendix A to the Resolution of Necessity are necessary for the construction of the Project, as planned and designed. The approximate locations of the property interests also are shown on aerial right of way image attached hereto as Exhibit “B.” All efforts have been made to reduce the physical and operational impacts to adjacent properties, both during and after construction of the Project. The Project cannot be constructed as designed and planned without the acquisition of the property interests described in Appendix A to the Resolution of Necessity. As described in Appendix A to the Resolution of Necessity, and as shown in Exhibit B to this board order, the property and property interests include (1) a fee parcel measuring approximately 6,308 square feet of land, and (2) a temporary construction easement measuring approximately 13,575 square feet of land. A portion of the temporary construction easement (TCE), Parcel 3A, measuring approximately 1,064 square feet of land, will be an exclusive easement for approximately seven months. The approximate locations of the fee parcel and the TCE, including Parcel 3A, are shown in Exhibit B attached hereto.  
  
4. The offer of compensation required by Section 7267.2 of the Government Code has beenmade to the owners of record.  
  
The County, through the Real Estate Division of the Public Works Department, has made an offer of just compensation to the owners of record for the property and property interests to be acquired for this Project. The offers were based on appraisals of the fair market value of the property and property interests being acquired. In this case, efforts were made to acquire each required property or property interest through negotiated purchase and sale instead of condemnation. Attempts to negotiate a settlement involved discussions, and in some cases meetings with the owners of record and/or their representatives. However, the negotiations have not been successful, requiring the County to proceed with the adoption of this Resolution of Necessity to proceed with the Project.   
  

CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION:

The County will be unable to acquire, by eminent domain, the property and property interests necessary for the Project.  
  

CLERK'S ADDENDUM

Speakers: Mr. Stokes, Donahue Schriber; Daniel Steinberg, Trainer Fairbrook Attorneys At Law (Written commentary attached).

AgendaQuick©2005 - 2024 Destiny Software Inc., All Rights Reserved