PDF Return
SD.3
To: Board of Supervisors
From: David Twa, County Administrator
Date: March  17, 2009
The Seal of Contra Costa County, CA
Contra
Costa
County
Subject: CONTRACT AMENDMENT WITH COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION FOR CONFLICT DEFENSE SERVICES

APPROVE OTHER
RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE

Action of Board On:   03/17/2009
APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
Clerks Notes:

VOTE OF SUPERVISORS

AYE:
John Gioia, District I Supervisor
Gayle B. Uilkema, District II Supervisor
Susan A. Bonilla, District IV Supervisor
Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor
Contact: Julie Enea (925) 335-1077
cc: County Administrator (Enea)     County Finance Director     Auditor-Controller    
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED:     March  17, 2009
David Twa,
 
BY: , Deputy

 

RECOMMENDATION(S):

  1. APPROVE Appropriations Adjustment No. 5073 authorizing the transfer of appropriations in the amount of $1,300,000 from the Contingency Reserve (0990) to Conflict Defense (0248); and   


  2. APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the County Administrator, or designee, to execute a contract amendment with the Contra Costa County Bar Association to increase the payment limit by $1,300,000 to a new payment limit of $3,975,000 annually to continue to provide mandated criminal conflict defense and other legal services for the period July 1, 2008 through June 30, 2010.

RECOMMENDATION(S): (CONT'D)

    FISCAL IMPACT:

    The budgeted amount for fiscal year 2008/09 in General Fund Budget Unit 0248 – Conflict Defense Services was insufficient to cover the rapidly escalating costs for mandated conflict defense services, necessitating a transfer of approprations from the County's Contingency Reserve to augment the Conflict Defense budget. The transfer will effect a reduction in the Contingency Reserve of $1,300,000.  

    BACKGROUND:

    Since 1983, the County has contracted with the Contra Costa County Bar Association for the provision of conflict defense services as a lower-cost alternative to the old system of court-appointed counsel. Subsequently, in FY 1991/92, the Public Defender created an Alternate Defender’s Office to handle conflict cases. The cases referred to the Bar Association generally represent multiple co-defendant cases in which the Alternate Defender’s Office can represent only one co-defendant.  
      
    The contract with the Bar Association for conflict defense services includes only the costs associated with representing criminal and delinquency cases referred to the Bar Association through a written affidavit conflict by the Public Defender and the Alternate Defender, and the costs to provide legal services in juvenile immigration cases. This fiscal year is the first since 1983 that the Bar contract will not provide for representation in juvenile dependency cases, due to the Superior Court's decision to terminate services provided by the County for juvenile dependency cases.   
      
    Following is a history of actual conflict defense Bar referrals and costs:  
      
      

    Fiscal Year Cost Non-Capital Homicides Capital Homicides
    2003/04: $1,550,989 21 1
    2004/05: $1,800,505 25 1
    2005/06: $2,025,534 24 1
    2006/07: $2,075,778 29 4
    2007/08: $3,403,771 45 12
    2008/09 Proj $3,975,000 56 11
    As of 2/09 $2,960,633 46 0
      
      
      
      
    CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION:

    Payment of criminal conflict attorney services is a mandated County cost. If the recommended action is not approved, the contract with the Bar Association will terminate and the County will be unable to fulfill its mandated obligations. The appointment and payment of private attorneys for conflict cases that cannot be handled by the Alternate Defender’s Office will revert to the court-appointed method used prior to the Bar Association contract, which has been shown to be less economical. All active and new criminal and delinquency conflict cases will be referred to the courts for appointment of defense counsel. The County will continue to be obligated to pay the Bar for cases previously assigned to the Bar and still in progress, as stipulated in our contract.

    AgendaQuick©2005 - 2024 Destiny Software Inc., All Rights Reserved