Following up the remaining recommendations from above, in September 2016 County Administrator staff worked with the Reentry Coordinator and representatives from the AB 109 Community Advisory Board (CAB), the District Attorney’s Office (Tom Kensok), the Public Defender Robin Lipetzky, and the Racial Justice Coalition (Jeff Landau) to develop and release a Request for Proposals (RFP) to secure “Facilitation and Data Analyst Services” to help guide the work of the Task Force. The composition of a Review Panel was also selected that consisted of four representatives from the County’s law and justice partners (District Attorney, Probation, Sheriff, and Public Defender) and four representatives of the public that were appointed by the Racial Justice Coalition.
When no responses were received to this initial RFP, CAO staff solicited input from attendees of the Bidders Conference as to their reasons for not submitting a response and refashioned the solicitation into a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) that was released on December 12, 2016. With these changes, three qualifying responses were received by the County Administrator by the deadline from: Informing Change, Learning for Action, and Resource Development Associates. The following Review Panel was then convened to review each of these responses:
Review Panel for Contra Costa County RFQ #1612-205[1]
Name |
Affiliation |
Lesha Roth |
Contra Costa Probation Department |
Robin Lipetzky |
Contra Costa Public Defender |
Tom Kensok |
Contra Costa District Attorney’s Office |
John Lowden |
Contra Costa Office of the Sheriff-Coroner |
Stephanie Medley[2] |
RYSE Center |
Claudia Jimenez |
Racial Justice Coalition |
Tamisha Walker |
Safe Return Project |
Panel Process and Recommendation
The Panel convened to review and score the responses on January 17, 2017, using a consensus scoring process that produced a single score for each response. The Panel then decided to interview the responses with the two highest scores on January 30, 2017. When the process was complete, and based on the scores below, the Panel reached a consensus recommendation that the County contract with Resource Development Associates for both “Facilitation and Data Analyst Services” related to the work of the Racial Justice Task Force.
As part of their final deliberations, and based on the expected scope of services to be provided, several Members of the Review Panel wanted to ensure that their recommendation included an acknowledgement that they would have preferred the scoring devote a larger proportion of points specifically dedicated to a firm’s understanding and experience as it relates to cultural competence, diversity, and race related issues.
Final scoring for RFQ#1612-205
|
Informing Change |
Learning for Action |
Resource Development Associates |
II.1-Agency Overview |
- Organization’s overall services/history (20pts)
|
13 |
14 |
18 |
II.2-Qualifications |
- Capacity to Provide Services (10pts)
|
7 |
7 |
8 |
- Technical Expertise (20pts)
|
8 |
14 |
17 |
- Experience with Similar Projects (20pts)
|
7 |
15 |
17 |
- Program Implementation (20pts)
|
9 |
14.5 |
16.5 |
III. Fee Information |
|
|
|
- Fees reasonable, cost-effective, and necessary (10 pts)
|
5 |
7 |
8 |
Total (100 pts) |
49 |
71.5 |
84.5 |
[1] It should be noted that the Racial Justice Coalition appointed a fourth member to the Review Panel, Jovana Fajardo, but Jovana was unable to participate due to unexpected health issues.
[2] Due to scheduling changes and conflicts, Stephanie Medley was unable to participate in the interview portion of the process, but was did take part in the consensus scoring of each response.
|