PDF Return
D.2
To: Contra Costa County Housing Authority Board of Commissioners
From: Joseph Villarreal, Housing Authority
Date: February  25, 2014
The Seal of Contra Costa County, CA
Contra
Costa
County
Subject: Section 8 Management Assessment Program Corrective Action Plan

Action of Board On:   02/25/2014
APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
Clerks Notes:

VOTE OF SUPERVISORS

AYE:
John Gioia, District I Commissioner
Candace Andersen, District II Commissioner
Mary N. Piepho, District III Commissioner
Karen Mitchoff, District IV Commissioner
ABSENT:
Federal D. Glover, District V Commissioner
Geneva Green, Tenant Seat
Contact: 925-957-8028
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED:     February  25, 2014
,
 
BY: , Deputy

 

RECOMMENDATIONS

APPROVE for submission to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), the Housing Authority of the County of Contra Costa’s (HACCC) proposed Corrective Action Plan (CAP) designed to improve performance in two areas and respond to one concern noted in HUD’s confirmatory review of the HACCC’s Section 8 Management Assessment Program (SEMAP) certification for the fiscal year ending 2013.

BACKGROUND

HUD conducted an onsite confirmatory review of HACCC’s SEMAP submission for fiscal year ending 2013. HUD’s examination showed that HACCC’s rating had improved to 78% and thus HACCC is now considered a standard performer under SEMAP. In a letter that confirms HACCC's standard rating, HUD also identified two findings and one concern that must be addressed by HACCC in a CAP format to HUD. Specifically, HUD did not award HACCC any points on the SEMAP Indicators for Selection from the Waiting List and Determination of Adjusted Income. While HACCC received full points for the Lease-up Indicator, HUD noted a significant gap between the agency’s budget utilization (the percent of allocated subsidy dollars spent on voucher subsidies), which is quite high at 98%, and unit utilization (the percent of allocated units under contract), which is relatively low at 94% in November 2013.  
  
Attached is the confirmatory review follow-up letter provided by HUD and staff’s proposed CAP. Staff will review these with the Board at the meeting.

FISCAL IMPACT

None. Information item only.

CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION

Should the Board of Commissioners elect not to approve the proposed Corrective Action Plan, or a modified version, HACCC would be in jeopardy of HUD sanctions.

CLERK'S ADDENDUM

AgendaQuick©2005 - 2024 Destiny Software Inc., All Rights Reserved