In eminent domain actions the judgment will be the price paid for the property, and may include court costs which are regarded as a roughly calculable expense of property acquisition. Costs of acquisition in this case are 100% reimbursable from Contra Costa Transportation Authority (CCTA). There will be no impact to the County General Fund.

  
A. Proposed Project - CCTA in cooperation with the State of California, acting by and through its Department of Transportation (Caltrans), propose to widen State Route 4 (SR4) East from its current four lanes to an eight-lane facility, reconstruct interchanges, perform work on affected local roadways, and relocate existing utilities from east of Somersville Road to west of Contra Loma Boulevard, in the Antioch and Pittsburg areas. The improved corridor will connect to the existing eight-lane freeway system comprised of three mixed-flow lanes and one high occupancy vehicle (HOV) lane in each direction west of Loveridge Road while preserving sufficient width in the SR4 median through the Loveridge Interchange to accommodate a possible future public transit improvement (by others). The proposed project will reduce existing traffic congestion, improve traffic operations, and encourage HOV use to accommodate travel demand anticipated through the year 2030.   
  
On June 27, 2006, this Board APPROVED the proposed project and ADOPTED the Negative Declaration and Finding of No Significant Impact pertaining to this project that was published on August 2, 2005.  
  
Under the agreement between the County, the State of California and CCTA for the exercise of the power of eminent domain for the SR4 (E) Widening – Somersville to SR160 Project dated January 18, 2008, the parties agreed and reaffirmed that the County is designated as the party to administer the portion of the Cooperative Agreement relating to the acquisition of real property, through eminent domain or otherwise, by and through its Board of Supervisors, County officials and departments, and County attorneys.   
  
This phase of the project consists of acquiring various land rights from 23 parcels in the project area. The land rights include fee title, temporary construction easements, a slope easement, sanitary sewer easements, and permanent overhead and pole line easements along the southerly and northerly side of SR4 near Somersville Road in the Antioch and Pittsburg areas.   
  
The County, through the Real Property Division of the Public Works Department, has made an offer of just compensation to the owners of the properties for the rights required for this Segment of the project. The offers were based on appraisals of the fair market value of said property rights.   
  
Construction of the project is scheduled to begin in the summer of 2010. In order to proceed with the project, it is necessary for the County to exercise its power of eminent domain. Pursuant to Section 1245.235 of the Code of Civil Procedure, notice was given to the persons listed on the attached Exhibit “A” whose names and addresses appear on the last equalized County Assessment Roll.  
  
This notice consisted of sending by first-class and certified mail on October 22, 2009, a Notice of Intention which notified the owners that a hearing on the Board’s intent to adopt the attached Resolution is scheduled for December 8, 2009, at 9:30 a.m., in the Board's Chambers, at which time they may appear to be heard on the matters referred to in the notice.  
  
B. Scope of Hearing Per C.C.P. Section 1245.235  
  
1. Public Interest and Necessity require the proposed project.  
  
SR4 is the only east-west transportation corridor in this area that provides direct access from Pittsburg, Antioch, and Brentwood to the greater Bay Area to the west and a link between Contra Costa County and San Joaquin County to the east. Traffic volume on the existing roadway is beyond system capacity, due to development in East County. This has resulted in severe congestion and increased travel times. Further increases in traffic volume will result in gridlock, not only in the freeway system, but also in the alternative local street network located near the congested freeway. The project will increase the use of HOV lanes while preserving sufficient width in the SR4 median to accommodate future mass transit services to and from East County.   
  
2. The project is planned and located in the manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and the least private injury.  
  
Through the planning phase of the project a number of interchange configuration, mainline highway alignment and Somersville Road alignment alternatives were studied. The interchange configuration, mainline highway alignment and Somersville Road alignment selected achieved the required operational traffic improvements with the least impact to adjacent properties. The alternative selected was designed to meet the operational traffic needs of the interchange and Somersville Road and was designed in conformance with Caltrans and City of Antioch design standards. The other alternative designs not selected would have resulted in greater impact to both residential and commercial properties and would have required more utility relocation.   
  
3. The properties sought to be acquired are necessary for the project,   
  
The properties sought for this Segment of the project are necessary for the widening of State Route 4, the reconfiguration of the Somersville Road Interchange and the widening along Somersville Road. All efforts have been made to reduce physical and operational impacts to adjacent properties both during and after construction. The project cannot be constructed as planned without the acquisition of these properties.   
  
4. The offer of compensation required by Section 7267.2 of the Government Code has been made to owner or owners of record.  
  
The County, through the Real Property Division of the Public Works Department, has made an offer of just compensation to the owners of record for the rights required for this project. The offers were based on appraisals of the fair market value of said property rights. In each case, efforts were made to acquire the required properties through negotiated purchase and sale instead of condemnation. Attempts to negotiate a settlement involved discussions and in some cases meetings with the owners of record and/or their representatives.   

The County will be unable to acquire the property rights necessary for the project.