PDF Return
C. 22
To: Board of Supervisors
From: David Twa, County Administrator
Date: January  19, 2016
The Seal of Contra Costa County, CA
Contra
Costa
County
Subject: Property Tax Administrative Cost Recovery

APPROVE OTHER
RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE

Action of Board On:   01/19/2016
APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
Clerks Notes:

VOTE OF SUPERVISORS

AYE:
John Gioia, District I Supervisor
Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor
Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor
Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor
ABSENT:
Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor
Contact: Lisa Driscoll (925) 335-1023
cc: Robert Campbell, County Auditor-Controller    
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED:     January  19, 2016
David Twa,
 
BY: , Deputy

 

RECOMMENDATION(S):


  1. RECEIVE the 2015-2016 report of the Auditor-Controller that contains the property tax-related costs of the Assessor, Tax Collector, Auditor and Assessment Appeals Board for the 2014-2015 fiscal year, as required by Resolution No. 97/129;


  2. FIX March 1, 2016 at 9:30 a.m. for a public hearing on the determination of property tax administrative costs;


RECOMMENDATION(S): (CONT'D)
    DIRECT the Clerk of the Board to notify affected local jurisdictions of the public hearing; and
  1. DIRECT the Clerk of the Board to prepare and publish the required legal notice and make supporting documentation available for public inspection.

FISCAL IMPACT:

None. The report details the property tax-related costs of the County in fiscal year 2014-2015 in order to determine the amount of cost recovery in fiscal year 2015-2016. The determination of the property tax administrative costs will occur at the hearing on March 1, 2016.  

BACKGROUND:

In 1997, the Board of Supervisors adopted Resolution No. 97/129 which provides procedures for property tax administrative cost recovery. The recommended actions are necessary for implementation of Resolution No. 97/129 for the current fiscal year.  

CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION:

If the hearing is not set to consider and adopt the finding of property tax costs, the costs cannot be recovered, resulting in a loss of General Fund revenue in the current fiscal year.  

AgendaQuick©2005 - 2024 Destiny Software Inc., All Rights Reserved