Agenda

Return

C. 9

To:	Board of Supervisors
From:	Julia R. Bueren, Public Works Director/Chief Engineer
Date:	January 5, 2016

Contra

Costa

County

Subject:

Approving the eighth extension of the Drainage Improvement Agreement for drainage acceptance DA04-00035, Danville area.

APPROVE	OTHER
RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR	RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE

Action of Board On: 01/05/2016

APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED

OTHER

Clerks Notes:

VOTE OF SUPERVISORS

AYE:

John Gioia, District I Supervisor
Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor
Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor
Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor
Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor

Contact:	Jocelyn A. B. LaRocque, 925-313-2315
cc:	J. A.B. LaRocque - Engineering Services Engineering Services Originator Design/Construction Division Current Planning - DCD Shapell Homes, , 6800 Koll Center Pkwy., Ste. 320, Pleasanton, CA 94566 National Fire Insur. Co. of Hartford 100 Matsonford Rd, #200 Radnor PA 19087 T - 11-9-16

I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED: January 5, 2016
David Twa,

BY:	, Deputy

RECOMMENDATION(S):

ADOPT Resolution No. 2016/5 approving the eighth extension of the Drainage Improvement Agreement for drainage acceptance DA04-00035 (cross-reference SD99-08381), for a project being developed by Shapell Homes, a Division of Shapell Industries, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, as recommended by the Public Works Director, Danville area. (District III)

FISCAL IMPACT:

No fiscal impact.

BACKGROUND:

The terminal date of the Drainage Improvement Agreement needs to be extended. The developer has not completed the required improvements and has requested more time. (Approximately 75% of the work has been completed to date.) By granting an extension, the County will give the developer more time to complete the improvements and keeps the bond current.

CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION:

The terminal date of the Drainage Improvement Agreement will not be extended and the developer will be in default of the agreement, requiring the County to take legal action against the developer and surety to ensure completion of the improvements.