Agenda

Return

C. 49

To:	Board of Supervisors
From:	David Twa, County Administrator
Date:	January 10, 2012

Contra

Costa

County

Subject:

P300 #21037 Add and Cancel

APPROVE	OTHER
RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR	RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE

Action of Board On: 01/10/2012

APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED

OTHER

Clerks Notes:

VOTE OF SUPERVISORS

AYE:

John Gioia, District I Supervisor
Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor
Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor
Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor

ABSENT:

Gayle B. Uilkema, District II Supervisor

Contact:

Lynn Reichard-Enea 925-427-8138

I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED: January 10, 2012
David Twa,

BY:	, Deputy

RECOMMENDATION(S):

Adopt Position Adjustment Resolution No. 21037 to add one 40/40 Board of Supervisors Assistant - Specialist position (J994) unrepresented at salary level B85 1652 ($5333.72 - $5600.40) and cancel two vacant 20/40 Board of Supervisors Assistant - General Office (J992) positions #14572 and #14573 in the District V Board of Supervisors Office.

FISCAL IMPACT:

This action reverses the action of October 11, 2011 and upgrades the position to a Specialist level. The annual increased cost is approximately $20,000 depending upon benefit selection/enrollment. The current year impact is estimated to be $10,000 and will be covered with salary savings.

BACKGROUND:

On July 26, 2011, the Board of Supervisors approved Map Proposal 17D Amended on a 3-2 vote as the proposed new supervisorial district boundaries. On August 9, 2011, the Board of Supervisors approved Ordinance No. 2011-15, establishing the proposed boundaries and set the effective date at September 9, 2011.

BACKGROUND: (CONT'D)

These new supervisorial district boundaries have resulted in a dramatic geographic change for District V. As a result of the realignment, the Supervisor's staffing needs require adjustment.

CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION:

The District V Office will not have the staffing allocation necessary to meet the needs of their constituents.

CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT:

No Impact.