PDF Return
C.12
To: Board of Supervisors
From: David Twa, County Administrator
Date: January  18, 2011
The Seal of Contra Costa County, CA
Contra
Costa
County
Subject: Property Tax Administrative Cost Recovery

APPROVE OTHER
RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE

Action of Board On:   01/18/2011
APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
Clerks Notes:

VOTE OF SUPERVISORS

AYE:
John Gioia, District I Supervisor
Gayle B. Uilkema, District II Supervisor
Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor
Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor
Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor
Contact: Lisa Driscoll (925) 335-1023
cc: Laura Strobel     Robert Campbell, County Auditor-Controller     Lisa Driscoll, County Finance Director    
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED:     January  18, 2011
David Twa,
 
BY: , Deputy

 

RECOMMENDATION(S):

  1. RECEIVE the 2010-11 report of the Auditor-Controller that contains the property tax-related costs of the Assessor, Tax Collector, Auditor and Assessment Appeals Board for the 2009-10 fiscal year, as required by Resolution 97/129.

  2. FIX March 1, 2011 at 9:30 a.m. for a public hearing on the determination of property tax administrative costs.

  3. DIRECT the Clerk of the Board to notify affected local jurisdictions of the public hearing.

  4. DIRECT the Clerk of the Board to prepare and publish the required legal notice and make supporting documentation available for public inspection.

RECOMMENDATION(S): (CONT'D)

    FISCAL IMPACT:

    None. The report details the property tax-related costs of the County in fiscal year 2009-10 in order to determine the amount of cost recovery in fiscal year 2010-11. The determination of the property tax administrative costs will occur at the hearing on March 1, 2011.  

    BACKGROUND:

    In 1997, the Board of Supervisors adopted Resolution 97/129 which provides procedures for property tax administrative cost recovery. The recommended actions are necessary for implementation of Resolution 97/129 for the current fiscal year.  

    CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION:

    If the hearing is not set to consider and adopt the finding of property tax costs, the costs cannot be recovered, resulting in a loss of General Fund revenue in the current fiscal year.  

    CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT:

    None.  

    AgendaQuick©2005 - 2024 Destiny Software Inc., All Rights Reserved