PDF Return
SD. 6
To: Board of Supervisors
From: Jason Crapo, County Building Official
Date: January  26, 2010
The Seal of Contra Costa County, CA
Contra
Costa
County
Subject: Cost Confirmation Hearing for 52 Willard Ave., Richmond, CA

APPROVE OTHER
RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE

Action of Board On:   01/26/2010
APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
Clerks Notes:

VOTE OF SUPERVISORS

AYE:
John Gioia, District I Supervisor
Gayle B. Uilkema, District II Supervisor
Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor
Susan A. Bonilla, District IV Supervisor
Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor
Contact: Jason Crapo 335-1108
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED:     January  26, 2010
David Twa,
 
BY: , Deputy

 

RECOMMENDATION(S):

OPEN the hearing on the attached itemized report on the costs of abating a public nuisance on the real property located at 52 Willard Avenue, Richmond, CA, Contra Costa County; APN 409-021-004; RECEIVE and CONSIDER the report and any objections from the property owner and other persons with a legal interest in the property; and CLOSE the hearing.  
  

DETERMINE the costs of all abatement work and all administrative costs to be $1,487.92.  

  

RECOMMENDATION(S): (CONT'D)
ORDER the itemized report confirmed and DIRECT it to be filed with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors.  
  
ORDER the costs to be specially assessed against the above-referenced property and AUTHORIZE the recordation of a Notice Of Abatement Lien.  

FISCAL IMPACT:

The costs as determined above will be added to the tax roll as a special assessment and will be collected at the same time and in the same manner as ordinary county taxes are collected.

BACKGROUND:

Contra Costa County Ordinance Code Article 14-6.4 and Government Code Section 25845 authorize the recovery of abatement costs in public nuisance cases, the recordation of a Notice of Abatement Lien, and inclusion of abatement costs on the tax roll as a special assessment upon approval of the Board of Supervisors.  
  
The Notice to Comply was posted on the above-referenced property for a vacant structure whose premises contain waste, rubbish, debris and excessive vegetation and served on the property owner and all persons known to be in possession of the property by certified mail on August 19, 2009.  
  
The property owner did not file an appeal. The County Abatement Officer abated the nuisance on October 13, 2009.  
  
The property owner was billed for the actual cost of the abatement and all administrative costs. The bill was sent by certified and first-class mail to the property owner on October 15, 2009. The property owner did not pay the bill within 45 days of the date of mailing.  
  
Notice of this Cost Hearing was sent to the property owner by certified mail by the Clerk of the Board – see Clerk of the Board’s mailing confirmation.  

AgendaQuick©2005 - 2024 Destiny Software Inc., All Rights Reserved