PDF Return
SD. 4
To: Board of Supervisors
From: Jason Crapo, County Building Official
Date: May  5, 2009
The Seal of Contra Costa County, CA
Contra
Costa
County
Subject: Confirmation Hearing: Report of Abatement Costs for 1222 Rose St., Crockett

APPROVE OTHER
RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE

Action of Board On:   05/05/2009
APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
Clerks Notes:

VOTE OF SUPERVISORS

AYE:
John Gioia, District I Supervisor
Gayle B. Uilkema, District II Supervisor
Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor
Susan A. Bonilla, District IV Supervisor
Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor
Contact: Michael Angelo Silva 925-335-1144
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED:     May  5, 2009
David Twa,
 
BY: , Deputy

 

RECOMMENDATION(S):

OPEN the hearing on the attached itemized report on the costs of abating a public nuisance on the real property located at 1222 Rose St., Crockett, CA, Contra Costa County; APN 354-178-008; RECEIVE and CONSIDER the report and any objections from the property owner and other persons with a legal interest in the property; and CLOSE the hearing.  
  

DETERMINE the costs of all abatement work and all administrative costs to be $703.98.  

  

RECOMMENDATION(S): (CONT'D)
ORDER the itemized report confirmed and DIRECT it to be filed with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors.  
  
ORDER the costs to be specially assessed against the above-referenced property and AUTHORIZE the recordation of a Notice Of Abatement Lien.  

FISCAL IMPACT:

The costs as determined above will be added to the tax roll as a special assessment and will be collected at the same time and in the same manner as ordinary county taxes are collected.

BACKGROUND:

Contra Costa County Ordinance Code Article 14-6.4 and Government Code Section 25845 authorize the recovery of abatement costs in public nuisance cases, the recordation of a Notice of Abatement Lien, and inclusion of abatement costs on the tax roll as a special assessment upon approval of the Board of Supervisors.  
  
The Notice and Order to Abate was posted on the above-referenced property and served on the property owner and all persons known to be in possession of the property by certified mail on January 16, 2008.  
  
The tenant of the property filed an appeal on January 31, 2008, of the Notice and Order to Abate. The Appeal was heard on March 11, 2008. Neither the property owner or tenant appeared. The contractor made several attempts to abate the nuisance. The abatement was completed on August 11, 2008.  
  
The property owner(s) was billed for the actual cost of all administrative costs. The bill was sent by first-class mail to the property owner(s) on January 23, 2009. The property owner did not pay the bill within 45 days of the date of mailing.  
  
Notice of this Cost Hearing was sent to the property owner by certified mail by the Clerk of the Board – see Clerk of the Board’s mailing confirmation.  

AgendaQuick©2005 - 2024 Destiny Software Inc., All Rights Reserved